The paper discusses different formats of the psyche in connection with opposing phantasmatic pre-decisions building the very basis of every kind of epistemology and ontology. An investigation of the key role of imagination shows that theoretical concepts and their objects devote themselves either to an imaginal phantasm of connection/correlation regarding reality, or to a constructivist one, stressing the opposite (imaginary) phantasm of separation. However, due to the fact that no God’s-eye-view is available, neither the realistic option nor the constructivist option can be verified/falsified in an ultimate concern. With respect to the key role of imagination, a medial format of the psyche is introduced, implying a switch from phenomenology’s principle of self-giving evidence to phenomediology: anything appearing or any phenomenon is considered of being dependent on multiple medial processes. According to this medialistic view, reality(ies) and objects only arise, because self-differentiated media permanently mediate each other. Against this background psyche can be described as a medium – as something that is literally between, located in a difference that belongs neither to one side nor to the other: between mind and matter, between inside and outside, between subject and object, between the individual and the collective. In this respect psyche can be seen as a medium of transforming not only the individual but also the traditions of politics, ethics, religions, and of social and economic conditions. This will be shown with respect to psyche’s entanglement with technical media.
Published in | International Journal of Psychological and Brain Sciences (Volume 6, Issue 6) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijpbs.20210606.14 |
Page(s) | 95-100 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Psyche, Phantasm, Medium, Ethics, Absolute Fragility
[1] | Sartre, J.-P. Das Imaginäre. Phänomenologische Psychologie der Einbildungskraft; Rowohlt: Hamburg, Germany, 1980; p. 284. |
[2] | Kamper, D. Zur Geschichte der Einbildungskraft; Rowohlt: Hamburg, Germany, 1990; p. 277. |
[3] | Gabriel, M. Fiktionen, Suhrkamp: Frankfurt, Germany, 2020; p. 28. |
[4] | Burda, G. Mediales Denken. Eine Phänomediologie; Passagen: Wien, Austria, 2010; p. 14. |
[5] | McLuhan, M. Die magischen Kanäle. Understanding Media; Verlag der Kunst: Dresden, Germany, 1992; p. 78. |
[6] | Kittler, F. Draculas Vermächtnis. Technischen Schriften; Reclam: Leipzig, Germany, 1993; p. 152. |
[7] | Flusser, V. Kommunikologie; Fischer: Frankfurt, Germany, 2003; p. 235. |
[8] | Bostrom, N. Die Zukunft der Menschheit. Aufsätze; Suhrkamp: Frankfurt, Germany, 2018; p. 45. |
[9] | Floridi, L. Die 4. Revolution: Wie die Infosphäre unser Leben verändert; Suhrkamp: Berlin, Germany, 2015; p. 134. |
[10] | Burda, G. Absolut Medial. Essay zur Theo-Techno-Anthropo-Mediologie; Bautz: Nordhausen, Germany, 2021; p. 6. |
[11] | Roth, G. Hat die Seele in der Hirnforschung noch einen Platz? Peschl, M. F., Ed.; Die Rolle der Seele in der Kognitions- und Neurowissenschaft. Auf der Suche nach dem Substrat der Seele; Königshausen & Neumann: Würzburg, Germany, 2005; pp. 27-39. |
[12] | Burda, G. Formate der Seele. Erkenntnistheoretische Grundlagen und ethische Implikationen der Allgemeinen Psychotherapiewissenschaft; Waxmann: Münster, Germany, 2012; p. 26. |
[13] | Groys, B. Unter Verdacht. Eine Phänomenologie der Medien; Hanser: München, Germany, 2000; p. 52. |
[14] | Burda, G. Formate der Seele. Erkenntnistheoretische Grundlagen und ethische Implikationen der Allgemeinen Psychotherapiewissenschaft; Waxmann: Münster, Germany, 2012; p. 84. |
[15] | Kittler, F. Draculas Vermächtnis. Technischen Schriften; Reclam: Leipzig, Germany, 1993; p. 133. |
[16] | Kittler, F. Martin Heidegger, Medien und die Götter Griechenlands. Ent-fernen heißt die Götter nähern; Roesler, A., Stiegler, B., Eds.; Philosophie in der Medientheorie von Adorno bis Žižek; Wilhelm Fink: München, Germany, 2003; pp. 133-143. |
[17] | Jung, C. G. Die Dynamik des Unbewussten (GW 8); Walter: Olten, Germany, 1947; §202. |
[18] | Burda, G. Religion und Differenz. Derrida-Lacan; Sonderzahl: Wien, Austria, 2008b; p. 6. |
[19] | Burda, G. Seelenpolitik. Über die Seele und andere Selbst-Differenzen; Passagen: Wien, Austria, 2009. |
[20] | Burda, G. Mediale Identität/en. Politik, Psychoanalyse und die Phantasmen von Verbindung und Trennung; Bautz: Nordhausen, Germany, 2018. |
[21] | Burda, G. Ethik. Raum – Gesetz – Begehren; Passagen: Wien, Austria, 2008a. |
[22] | Burda, G. Religion und Differenz. Derrida-Lacan; Sonderzahl: Wien, Austria 2008b. |
[23] | Burda, G. Psychoanalyse der Erlösung. Religion, Ethik, Politik, Film; Waxmann: Münster, Germany, 2016. |
APA Style
Gerhard Burda. (2021). Towards a Phenomediology of the Soul. International Journal of Psychological and Brain Sciences, 6(6), 95-100. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijpbs.20210606.14
ACS Style
Gerhard Burda. Towards a Phenomediology of the Soul. Int. J. Psychol. Brain Sci. 2021, 6(6), 95-100. doi: 10.11648/j.ijpbs.20210606.14
AMA Style
Gerhard Burda. Towards a Phenomediology of the Soul. Int J Psychol Brain Sci. 2021;6(6):95-100. doi: 10.11648/j.ijpbs.20210606.14
@article{10.11648/j.ijpbs.20210606.14, author = {Gerhard Burda}, title = {Towards a Phenomediology of the Soul}, journal = {International Journal of Psychological and Brain Sciences}, volume = {6}, number = {6}, pages = {95-100}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijpbs.20210606.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijpbs.20210606.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijpbs.20210606.14}, abstract = {The paper discusses different formats of the psyche in connection with opposing phantasmatic pre-decisions building the very basis of every kind of epistemology and ontology. An investigation of the key role of imagination shows that theoretical concepts and their objects devote themselves either to an imaginal phantasm of connection/correlation regarding reality, or to a constructivist one, stressing the opposite (imaginary) phantasm of separation. However, due to the fact that no God’s-eye-view is available, neither the realistic option nor the constructivist option can be verified/falsified in an ultimate concern. With respect to the key role of imagination, a medial format of the psyche is introduced, implying a switch from phenomenology’s principle of self-giving evidence to phenomediology: anything appearing or any phenomenon is considered of being dependent on multiple medial processes. According to this medialistic view, reality(ies) and objects only arise, because self-differentiated media permanently mediate each other. Against this background psyche can be described as a medium – as something that is literally between, located in a difference that belongs neither to one side nor to the other: between mind and matter, between inside and outside, between subject and object, between the individual and the collective. In this respect psyche can be seen as a medium of transforming not only the individual but also the traditions of politics, ethics, religions, and of social and economic conditions. This will be shown with respect to psyche’s entanglement with technical media.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Towards a Phenomediology of the Soul AU - Gerhard Burda Y1 - 2021/11/27 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijpbs.20210606.14 DO - 10.11648/j.ijpbs.20210606.14 T2 - International Journal of Psychological and Brain Sciences JF - International Journal of Psychological and Brain Sciences JO - International Journal of Psychological and Brain Sciences SP - 95 EP - 100 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-1573 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijpbs.20210606.14 AB - The paper discusses different formats of the psyche in connection with opposing phantasmatic pre-decisions building the very basis of every kind of epistemology and ontology. An investigation of the key role of imagination shows that theoretical concepts and their objects devote themselves either to an imaginal phantasm of connection/correlation regarding reality, or to a constructivist one, stressing the opposite (imaginary) phantasm of separation. However, due to the fact that no God’s-eye-view is available, neither the realistic option nor the constructivist option can be verified/falsified in an ultimate concern. With respect to the key role of imagination, a medial format of the psyche is introduced, implying a switch from phenomenology’s principle of self-giving evidence to phenomediology: anything appearing or any phenomenon is considered of being dependent on multiple medial processes. According to this medialistic view, reality(ies) and objects only arise, because self-differentiated media permanently mediate each other. Against this background psyche can be described as a medium – as something that is literally between, located in a difference that belongs neither to one side nor to the other: between mind and matter, between inside and outside, between subject and object, between the individual and the collective. In this respect psyche can be seen as a medium of transforming not only the individual but also the traditions of politics, ethics, religions, and of social and economic conditions. This will be shown with respect to psyche’s entanglement with technical media. VL - 6 IS - 6 ER -